<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Web Coherence &#187; twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webcoherence.org/tag/twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webcoherence.org</link>
	<description>Experiments with Coherence on the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Did you tweet your password?</title>
		<link>http://webcoherence.org/featured-stories/did-you-tweet-your-password/</link>
		<comments>http://webcoherence.org/featured-stories/did-you-tweet-your-password/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>H Jain</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webcoherence.org/?p=751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Oh! I just love Twitter.&#8221; &#8220;Twitter is cool.&#8221; &#8220;I can write on the move and the message goes out! Isnt that great!&#8221; &#8220;I confess, I am indeed obsessed.&#8221; These are some of the responses I have received from Twitter users who tweet more than 20 times a day. The community of users who adore Twitter [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-380" title="twit_shock" src="http://webcoherence.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/twit_shock.jpg" alt="twit_shock" width="242" height="128" />&#8220;Oh! I just love Twitter.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Twitter is cool.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;I can write on the move and the message goes out! Isnt that great!&#8221;<br />
&#8220;I confess, I am indeed obsessed.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>These are some of the responses I have received from Twitter users who tweet more than 20 times a day. The community of users who adore Twitter and find it useful is no doubt huge. Along with it is growing the number of Twitter applications that could be used. Fancy some? The web is full of applications which could generate move value for a Twitter account with free to use functions like Personalised Auto responders to Twitter follow requests and messages, auto-follow whoever follows you, Twitter Rank Check, Twitter Friend Suggest or even you could try the Twitter CRM. There are thousands of applications, just google them up!</p>
<p>Twitter users are now increasingly using these innovative free to use tools, but do they ever check who owns these Twitter applications? I found that some of these Twitter applications were developed as school or college projects and were launched by students for people to use it for free. Amazing! isnt it? No, its NOT. Most Twitter applications ask you to supply your credentials so that the applications can work with Twitter and you dont know who is storing your passwords!!</p>
<p>And are these applications bug free? You never know, afterall they are student projects. I have just heard a sad story from a friend who lost all his followers because he was using a free tool to send personalised messages back. The tool malfunctioned and all his Twitter contacts were lost!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://webcoherence.org/featured-stories/did-you-tweet-your-password/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Profiling &#8211; Twitter joining the bandwagon!</title>
		<link>http://webcoherence.org/featured-stories/more-profiling-on-its-way-twitter-joining-the-bandwagon/</link>
		<comments>http://webcoherence.org/featured-stories/more-profiling-on-its-way-twitter-joining-the-bandwagon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>H Jain</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webcoherence.org/?p=171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter &#8211; the microblogging platform &#8211; boasts millions of subscribers, and its user base is experiencing exponential growth. The time is right for it to go the way of AdWords. With millions already invested, but a negligible Return on Investment, it is only to be expected that Twitter would soon start employing some payback strategies. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--StartFragment--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Twitter &#8211; the microblogging platform &#8211; boasts millions of subscribers, and its user base is experiencing exponential growth. The time is right for it to go the way of AdWords. With millions already invested, but a negligible Return on Investment, it is only to be expected that Twitter would soon start employing some payback strategies. Now, it seems, is the time for Twitter to follow in the footsteps of most other social networking sites.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">I logged into my Twitter account early this morning, and I immediately noticed some strange looking boxes appearing just underneath my profile stats: see the picture.</span></p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-172" title="twitter-adlike" src="http://webcoherence.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/twitter-adlike.jpg" alt="twitter-adlike" width="181" height="107" /></p>
<p>Currently these boxes are displaying Twitter applications &#8211; they started appearing soon after Twitter returned after two hours of maintenance downtime. How soon before we see advertisements taking their place? Advertisements mean that Twitter is profiling its user-base to ‘sell the right products to the right people’. Read more about profiling by following Professor Ian Angell&#8217;s  post <a href="http://webcoherence.org/2009/03/17/profiling-a-creature-of-the-shadows/">here</a>.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">The digital advertisement market is already facing heat because of the credit crunch, and it would interesting to see what strategies Twitter employs to stoke the fires in its engine-room.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Some readers might be tempted to think that Twitter, with only status updates, has little information with which to profile users. Think again! Twitter has real time information about each user’s current activities! They can target Ads with extreme accuracy, and will be experimenting with some clever profiling strategies. Don&#8217;t be surprised if, when you tweet &#8220;got my loan approved, Yipee!&#8221;, you find that predators are trying to sell you cars, holidays, or restaurants in which to celebrate now that you have “loadsamoney”!</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://webcoherence.org/featured-stories/more-profiling-on-its-way-twitter-joining-the-bandwagon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Marketing the Twitter Way!</title>
		<link>http://webcoherence.org/featured-stories/digital-marketing-the-twitter-way/</link>
		<comments>http://webcoherence.org/featured-stories/digital-marketing-the-twitter-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>H Jain</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Experiments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experiment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webcoherence.org/?p=433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How does the idea of marketing on a microblogging platform &#8211; Twitter  sound?  WebCoherence being already present there, we thought of experimenting with it. “But how?” &#8211; A discussion sparked between me and another Web Ecologist  &#8211; Railsbob. We were aiming to see if we could devise a way such that more people get to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-437" title="twit_mktg" src="http://webcoherence.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/twit_mktg.jpg" alt="twit_mktg" width="193" height="138" />How does the idea of marketing on a microblogging platform &#8211; <a href="http://www.twitter.com" target="_blank">Twitter</a>  sound?  WebCoherence being already present <a href="http://twitter.com/webcoherence" target="_blank">there,</a> we thought of experimenting with it.</p>
<p><em>“But how?”</em> &#8211; A discussion sparked between me and another Web Ecologist  &#8211; <a href="http://anup.info">Railsbob</a>. We were aiming to see if we could devise a way such that more people get to know about WebCoherence using Twitter’s platform and to setup an experiment around it. After going through a lot of Twitter updates Railsbob observed that users were using hashtags to communicate in a larger community. RailsBob suggested: <em>&#8221; If we use a relevant ‘#keyword’ as a  hashtag, we could possibly attract more users to our site via Twitter.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>&#8220;<em>Interesting</em>,&#8221; I exclaimed, &#8220;<em>but where do we find the relevant hashtags?&#8221; &#8220;It is not like the #communia conference, which some of our colleagues attended. They had a ready-made shared keyword. We don’t</em>.&#8221; Back to the drawing board!</p>
<p>RailsBob then suggested using the #hashtags database on <a href="http://www.hashtags.org">www.hashtags.org</a> to search for relevant Twitter #hashtags. Eureka! We now had a list of the most popular hashtags. We would use only those we found to be appropriate from among the most popular ones (namely listed at the top), and this would save hunting through the whole of what is a huge database. After all there was nothing to lose – the worst that could happen is that we remained unnoticed. As Web Ecologists, we were now ready to test the idea. We took top 5 hashtags from the database list and sent out tweets publicizing WebCoherence. We waited for 3 days to collect sufficient Google Analytics Reports and here is what we found.</p>
<p><strong>The Results:</strong><br />
1. In less than 24 hours 12 more followers started following WebCoherence on Twitter! And in 3 days now the count has risen to 53 followers. A staggering growth of 430% in three days from an initial count of 10 followers.<br />
2. Google analytics report shows 19 hits came to the website with the referring URL Twitter.com. The number of hits were quite less as compared to the number of followers who started following WebCoherence.org.<br />
3. Interestingly, no comments were received from new followers.</p>
<p>This brings us more mysteries that need to be solved before we come to any further conclusions. We are now left with various questions:</p>
<p>Do users follow on Twitter just to increase their follow count?<br />
How do users interact when they receive links to external websites on Twitter?<br />
Why do users want to increase their follow count if they are not interested in reading Twitter messages?</p>
<p>We intend to reveal answers to these questions in our upcoming posts as we analyse results and make more observations, keep watching!</p>
<p><strong>P.S.:</strong> If you have seen some odd behavior and if you wish to contribute by experimenting with WebCoherence, do get in touch with us by leaving comments to this post or by emailing us. Thanks in advance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://webcoherence.org/featured-stories/digital-marketing-the-twitter-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conference Twitting</title>
		<link>http://webcoherence.org/experiments/draft-conference-twitting-still-being-edited/</link>
		<comments>http://webcoherence.org/experiments/draft-conference-twitting-still-being-edited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 05:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>G.Chomic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Our Experiments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backchannel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webcoherence.org/?p=390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple days ago fellow webcoherence author Ian Angell wrote about the clatter he (and 80 other people in the room) were constantly immersed in during the first day of the Communia conference.  Ian closed with &#8216;at least the twitterers were listening&#8217; &#8211; which is at least partially true. But this whole twitter-during-conference thing is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple days ago fellow webcoherence author <a href="http://ianangell.com" target="_blank">Ian Angell</a> wrote about the <a href="http://webcoherence.org/community/twitter-clatter/" target="_blank">clatter</a> he (and 80 other people in the room) were constantly immersed in during the first day of the <a href="http://www.communia-project.eu/" target="_blank">Communia</a> conference.  Ian closed with &#8216;at least the twitterers were listening&#8217; &#8211; which is at least partially true.</p>
<p>But this whole twitter-during-conference thing is an interesting phenomenon.  On one side, it&#8217;s rude &#8211; typing instead of listening, talking about the speaker as if they aren&#8217;t even there &#8211; and yet on the other side it creates a whole backchannel of information.  Sure, there are the usual idiots &#8211; you can&#8217;t fill a room with educated geeks, lawyers, and businessmen without finding some are actually 4-year olds once you give them anonymity &#8211; but it serves it&#8217;s own niche, and has it&#8217;s own culture.</p>
<p>I mean think about it.   By participating in the #<a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23communia" target="_blank">communia</a> <a href="http://twitter.pbwiki.com/Hashtags" target="_blank">hashtag</a>, I met, virtually, other twitter users who follow the same topics, and now have a greater source of noise &#8211; I mean information with which to use.  These conventions &#8211; hash tagging, tracking by subject, forming a backchannel community of shared knowledge to be referenced later &#8211; all came together through the designs of users, not admins in the ivory office of tweeting.  And further, it&#8217;s become pervasive enough that it has been recognized as socially acceptable, not rude, and papers exist on how to <a href="http://www.maniactive.com/states/2008/10/presenting-to-thetwitter-backchannel.html" target="_blank">maximize</a> the <a href="http://mattherzberger.com/2008/07/28/back-channel-is-powerful/" target="_blank">microblog</a> <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/social/?p=110">backchannel</a>!  This is despite the heckling!  Emergent phenomena indeed.</p>
<p>And to what effect does this have?  It depends on your point of view.  I&#8217;ll say that in the afternoon, when most attendees lost internet access, I found it much easier to concentrate on the speaker&#8217;s content and not what my fellow attendees were saying.  But, I also was not gaining the oft-cited value of what the other people felt was important &#8211; and what sucked -  through their comments and what they chose to broadcast to their personal twitterstream.</p>
<p>Indeed, if I really wanted to get technical I could go in and see what the different types of twitter &#8216;animals&#8217; there are&#8230; or you could.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://webcoherence.org/experiments/draft-conference-twitting-still-being-edited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

