<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter &#8216;Spam&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webcoherence.org/featured-stories/twitter-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webcoherence.org/featured-stories/twitter-spam/</link>
	<description>Experiments with Coherence on the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 22:25:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.Chomic</title>
		<link>http://webcoherence.org/featured-stories/twitter-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>G.Chomic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 03:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webcoherence.org/?p=514#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Eh - spam is spam no matter how it is collected.  It&#039;s the concept of wholesale harvesting of data providing economic returns that is the problem.  Perhaps I&#039;ll write on it later... I&#039;ve got a bone to pick, but I&#039;m not positive it&#039;s in the nature of this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh &#8211; spam is spam no matter how it is collected.  It&#8217;s the concept of wholesale harvesting of data providing economic returns that is the problem.  Perhaps I&#8217;ll write on it later&#8230; I&#8217;ve got a bone to pick, but I&#8217;m not positive it&#8217;s in the nature of this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

